Size isn't everything on the international stage, argues Foreign
Minister Niels Helveg Petersen
In six months' time, Denmark will be chairing the Organisation for
Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE); from November 1995 until
May 1996, the country chaired the Council of Europe (COE). What can a
small country expect to achieve in the demanding role of chair of these
two organisations?
First, it should be clear that there is little chance of pushing through
any parochial national interests. The chair has one fundamental
function: to facilitate agreement on agenda issues. In the chair, you
are faced with all the issues stemming from the many problems facing us
today: creating stability and co-operation at a time of political,
economic and social transition and of considerable changes in our main
forums of co-operation. These challenges determine our agenda.
But as chairman, I also must have overall goals and priorities to guide
the day-to-day efforts. Strengthening international co-operation has
always been a prime objective of Danish foreign policy. Creating a
stable and transparent community of nations based upon common values is
essential for a small state. The COE and the OSCE and the values they
stand for in our view represent the basic foundations for building a new
Europe based on democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law.
Also, both organisations have proven able to integrate the new
independent states and to adjust to the changes in Europe since the end
of the Cold War.
The COE is one of Europe's oldest post-war organisations. Its activities
have broadened considerably, taking in areas such as assisting the new
member countries from Central and Eastern Europe in establishing
democratic institutions. The fundamental ideas which form the basis for
the COE, however, remain the same.
Since 1989 the number of members has grown from 23 to 39. When our
chairmanship began, the COE had just welcomed Ukraine and the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as new members. On 28 February I had the
honour to welcome Russia as the 39th member. I consider this an
important event during our chairmanship, that this large country with
its rich cultural heritage should be able to join. We have shown strong
support for Russian democracy, and Russia has in turn committed itself
to the high standards of the COE (for example, in the area of human
rights). We will extend assistance in the difficult process of reform
and will, at the same time, monitor compliance with the commitments made
by Russia. Another important event during our chairmanship of the COE was
the decision to allow observer status to the US.
The OSCE, in the guise of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in
Europe (CSCE), was born out of the Cold War and became a key forum for
security co-operation during the East-West confrontation of the 1970s
and 1980s. Through the active promotion of respect for human rights and
freedoms, the CSCE became a major agent in bringing about changes in
Europe. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the break-up of the Soviet
Union, the OSCE has evolved into a major framework for creating
stability, including stability in the many newly-independent states. The
OSCE's membership has grown from 33 to 55.
For both organisations, enlargement has emphasised the need to ensure
member countries' compliance with their obligations and commitments. It
is no secret that problems in this respect do exist in some member
countries. In the COE the Committee of Ministers has decided to set up a
monitoring system and, during our chairmanship, we have made progress
towards creating a workable mechanism in this field. Ensuring compliance
with, and implementation of, the OSCE's fundamental values - respect for
human rights and democracy - will be a main priority during our
chairmanship of the organisation.
In this field, as in others, it is a Danish policy goal to create closer
and more effective co-operation between international organisations, not
least between the COE and the OSCE. The two organisations cover some
common ground in questions of human rights. They complement each other
in many ways. This is presently being demonstrated in Bosnia, where the
peace plan has assigned both organisations important tasks in securing
human rights. Improving co-operation with other international organisations, such as
the UN and NATO, and non-governmental organisations is another Danish
objective.
The OSCE has developed a range of instruments for dealing with
conflicts, from early warning over conflict prevention and resolution to
post-conflict rehabilitation. Early warning and conflict prevention is
being conducted every day by the OSCE's institutions, and long-term
missions to various regions. The OSCE's role in Bosnia - to assist with
the holding of democratic elections, monitor human rights and to build
democratic institutions - is post-conflict rehabilitation in practice. It
is also by far the largest and most important mission the organisation
has ever undertaken.
Denmark intends to strengthen the instruments used in preventive
diplomacy. We would like to continue to develop and refine the
instruments to deal with the many challenges facing the organisation and
its member states; this also implies taking a closer look at the
institutions to keep them adaptable, flexible and effective.
Our main task will be to bring forward the process of developing a model
for European security for the 21st century. At a time of evolving
structures of security co-operation - most notably the enlargement of
the UN and NATO - we must maintain the OSCE as a comprehensive and
inclusive co-operation forum.
Chairing an international organisation such as the COE or the OSCE is
demanding, particularly for a small country with limited resources. But
we have not hesitated to take on these tasks. In doing so, we are
contributing actively to promoting the goals we all share: peace and
stability and thus a better world for all.
To TopTo Archive IntroductionTo Contents
©Kensington Publications 1996